Doing a systematic review in health sciences /

This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Cajala, Berta (autor.)
Autres auteurs: Jiménez, Rafael (autor.), Gervilla, Elena (autor.), Montaño, Juan J. (autor.)
Format: Article
Langue:anglais
Publié: [Madrid] : Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid, 2020.
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://elibro.unach.elogim.com/es/lc/unach/titulos/133886
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each stage. Systematic review and meta-analysis are currently the evidence synthesis tools of the highest level of scientific quality. They are in themselves a secondary research methodology, whose objective is to locate, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence by selecting original papers or quality primary publications. The procedure to achieve the objective is presented as a sequential and systematized process, in stages, following the transparency principle, so as to ensure its replicability.
Fréquence de publication:Cuatrimestral
ISSN:1130-5274
ISSN1130-5274